Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407C64196F2 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:31:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ckk8+0s-Yww for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765FA431FC1 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so523673wyf.26 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.130 with SMTP id e2mr4138541wef.210.1271925079375; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm3568725gve.14.2010.04.22.01.31.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF73C594163; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:31:16 +0100 (BST) To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] json: Replace `date_unix' with `timestamp' in show output In-Reply-To: <1271418469-19031-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> References: <1271418469-19031-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-20-g89ec2c1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:31:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87mxwvkhwr.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:31:21 -0000 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:47:49 +0100, David Edmondson wrote: > Search output was already using `timestamp' for a very similar field, > so follow that. Carl, this seems low-risk and easy to include for 0.3. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org