Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C10431FAF for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:40:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnIBcdSzTPwg for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA98C431FAE for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru1OR-0001O5-6D; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:40:31 +0000 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru1OQ-000239-T5; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:40:31 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: Adam Wolfe Gordon , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] emacs: Use the new JSON reply format. In-Reply-To: <1326995217-27423-5-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> References: <1326995217-27423-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <1326995217-27423-5-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+154~ged6d37e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:41:40 +0000 Message-ID: <874nv5wiyj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 6b6e291cb50986a30b0f1a5fc0c9c3d2 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:40:33 -0000 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:46:56 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: > Using the new JSON reply format allows emacs to quote HTML > parts nicely by using mm-display-part to turn them into displayable > text, then quoting them. This is very useful for users who > regularly receive HTML-only email. > > The behavior for messages that contain plain text parts should be > unchanged. Hi I have tried using this patch and it did give an identical emacs buffer when replying to text/plain or multipart/alternative messages except for two things: the old one put a line in the reply for each attachment not being included in the reply (eg "Attachment: file.pdf (application/pdf)" ) and the new one does not. and your version does not include text/plain attachments with disposition attachment (obviously as the cli part does not). [Note I am not saying whether either of these correct or not, just that they are changes.] It also worked nicely on the html only messages I tried it on. I have not reviewed the lisp yet; I will try and have a look at it but I am a lisp beginner. Best wishes Mark PS Sorry I sent this from my unsubscribed address first: since I am using your patch-set my recent reply From: modification wasn't there!