Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48EA431FBD for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:19:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIEEfchY3Kr0 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:19:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E631431FAE for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:19:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2so4147665bka.26 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.131.142 with SMTP id hq14mr233626bkc.89.1326662375064; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.33.73 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:19:35 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56] In-Reply-To: <87k44xgw09.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1326009162-19524-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <1326009162-19524-5-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <87k44xgw09.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:19:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] emacs: Use the new JSON reply format. From: Adam Wolfe Gordon To: Dmitry Kurochkin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:19:38 -0000 Hi Dmitry, On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 01:33, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > I did not follow the rest of the discussion, so sorry if I missed > something obvious. =A0But why can't we render HTML parts in replies the > same way we do in notmuch-show (using `mm-display-part')? =A0That should > not introduce a w3m.el requirement, would use the same renderer as > configured for show and hence would produce consistent output in show > and reply. Thanks for the suggestion - I've implemented this now and I think it's definitely the best way to go. New patches coming soon with all the suggested changes. --=20 Adam Wolfe Gordon