DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=C+UpBpTagBmZ/kvDNNeIVhJX3lden5TeC0OciEe37QfLHijF8fWdrbsh9b2WYFKQqs
	uB7OX33POCdbUOwpxZC30THZDTALwaGp5B01HCC0exT69l7RlvBxBxedLROviccSq/yp
	n0vZeGEvBZCAOxtEc/Awcm3fwVDx7l6VpWVx4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: amdragon@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimvs8ttQCL0AK9UrjcxxgaeqQ9fSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m3sjsv2kw2.fsf@zsu.kismala.com>
	<BANLkTimvs8ttQCL0AK9UrjcxxgaeqQ9fSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 22:43:00 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTin1OC-Xz5mwcV3awJVg3ZogUjihPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: storing From and Subject in xapian
From: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>
To: Istvan Marko <notmuch@kismala.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:
> As another data point, with a probably very different configuration (8
> year old P4, new SSD), my test query was 1.9X faster uncached and 1.6X
> faster cached. =A0It also produced 60% fewer disk reads. =A0I saw the sam=
e
> 1% increase in database size.

Oops, the email was on an SSD, but the database was on a separate
spinning disk.  With them both on the SSD, it's 2.1X faster uncached.