Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C856431FB6 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:55:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b-yoN5IqUFXg for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9914431FAF for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF39D100033; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:54:53 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] notmuch insert updates In-Reply-To: <878ul815jf.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <878ul815jf.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+97~g6c845ef (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 19:55:10 -0000 On Thu, Sep 25 2014, David Bremner wrote: > Jani Nikula writes: > >> This series refactors and cleans up insert, improves error handling and >> reporting, and adds post-insert hook. I intend to add documentation and >> more tests, but the code is ready for review. Also, at least some of the >> cleanups and fixes in the beginning of the series could go in without >> additional tests or documentation. > > The first 4 seem trivial, and I marked them so. > > 5-8 don't introduce new functionality, and don't break > any existing tests. Subject to a little more review, these could > probably be merged now. > > 5 is almost trivial; it wouldn't hurt to explicitly document the return > values of sync_dir, while touching this code. > > 6 and 8 seem ok, but should probably have another pair of eyes. > > 7 seems ok. At first I worried about the usual issue of races between > name definition and open, but it seems like nothing changes here. 5-8 in this series LGTM. Tomi