Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACB6431FB6 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.401 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1daNPuzmsI9u for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC3C431FAE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SN69N-00024d-Or; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:10 +0100 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SN69N-0003xU-AB; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:09 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: David Bremner , notmuch Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13 In-Reply-To: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87397r4srs.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: c64479a90d76d32b2991778c015f0947 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.2 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.2 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:37:14 -0000 On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, David Bremner wrote: > Hi All; > > I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of > May. What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and > pushed for 0.13? I would like id:"1331836090-30560-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" as I think that is pretty close to the final piece for the exclude stuff. I also think that id:"1334431301-27303-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" (which doesn't apply to master but I have a rebased version) makes excludes rather nicer. If anyone thinks that might be plausible I will post the rebased version. Finally, I agree that I would like to see the html reply stuff. Best wishes Mark