Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DA96DE025F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.483 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.261, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4Rof7yFps_l for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D552E6DE0B7C for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 05:42:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zf5pD-0006hs-Iv; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:40:35 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 17665 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:40:16 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] cli: change the data structure for notmuch address deduplication In-Reply-To: <87fv242e2a.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87fv242e2a.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+73~gd432116 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:40:16 -0300 Message-ID: <87bncs2dov.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:42:28 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Jani Nikula writes: > > >> + else >> + v = !!m1->name - !!m2->name; > > Is this really idiomatic? It seems a little difficult to follow to me. > Sorry, this stupid MUA I'm using confused me and I sent the reply halfway through reading the patch. Anyway, the rest looks OK. d