Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B70E431FD5 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:23:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AIY2AnqmaxR5 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5176431FB6 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:23:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so4125382wer.26 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.137.219 with SMTP id y69mr6482521wei.51.1327472584685; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j16sm22002181wie.4.2012.01.24.22.23.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000) id 98EB69FD47; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:01 +0000 (GMT) To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Emacs: Crypto: How to get automatic encryption? In-Reply-To: <87ehuoljzs.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87pqejj5nl.fsf@marcos.anarcat.ath.cx> <87ehuo7pjr.fsf@algae.riseup.net> <87ehuoljzs.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+105~g08b3b0f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:01 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmFxB/qAz+KKtiR/Wvaz8NEK3SgdmkKSLDoFle0LFoFSLS47tKxl+E+UXD9mRk27Wre/KRg X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:06 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:10:47 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:34:32 -0500, micah anderson wro= te: > > David replied to it because it was sent to him, but the list email > > hasn't come through yet (I want this functionality, so I'm dying to see > > the patch!) >=20 > Hey, Micah. There an outstanding patch series that add a new JSON reply > format, and then uses that in emacs [0]. Once that's in, it will be > relatively easy to implement auto-reply-to-encrypted. I'm going to work > on implementing that as soon as the above patch gets pushed to master. Can you explain the logic that will apply to determine whether or not a reply is encrypted? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8fn8UACgkQaezQq/BJZRYi/QCcCeUqYq5fNKDSM8TNAL1xg40p VvMAn0KxOgKhKEuzB8lQNGVtSx+Td9wj =UQQn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--