Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE106429E32 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:25:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QeQTqZS+YfDZ for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:25:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CCF8429E31 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:25:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so756745eek.26 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:25:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.16.135 with SMTP id h7mr1277533eeh.19.1325795119773; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:25:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe5cdc00-23.dhcp.inet.fi. [80.220.92.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm238050812eeb.3.2012.01.05.12.25.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:25:18 -0800 (PST) From: Jani Nikula To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, david@tethera.net Subject: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:25:11 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:25:22 -0000 Hi all - Patch 1 is a bugfix worth considering for release branch independently. Included in the same patchset as the following ones depend on it. The rest of the patches add reply-to-sender (as opposed to reply-to-all) functionality to "notmuch reply" and emacs. Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)? Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)? Obviously, this set is missing tests and documentation, but I'd like to get the first round of review and the above topics settled first. :) BR, Jani. Jani Nikula (4): cli: fix use of uninitialized variable in "notmuch reply" cli: convert "notmuch reply" to use the new argument parser cli: add support for replying just to the sender in "notmuch reply" emacs: add support for replying just to the sender of messages and threads emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 8 ++- emacs/notmuch-show.el | 12 ++++- emacs/notmuch.el | 11 ++++- notmuch-reply.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) -- 1.7.5.4