1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FB1429E26
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
\r
13 autolearn=unavailable
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id cuv2GAV0Ww0Q for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8625431FD0
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC8866E0381;
\r
24 Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
26 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (gwave-176.ligo.caltech.edu
\r
27 [131.215.114.176]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
28 by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4AC66E01F4;
\r
29 Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
\r
30 Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
31 id 49835625; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
\r
32 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
33 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,
\r
34 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
35 Subject: Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6]
\r
36 In-Reply-To: <87ei3ybawo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
37 References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
38 <874o4zczr8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
39 <87wrhvyqfn.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
40 <87r57ybcna.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
41 <4DD18DFE.7090206@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
42 <87ei3ybawo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
43 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
44 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
45 Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700
\r
46 Message-ID: <87wrhq8e6a.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
48 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
49 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
50 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:37:57 -0000
\r
66 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
68 On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:07 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
69 > I'll have to learn better how to control the emacs mail composer in
\r
70 > order to understand how to get signatures to cover attachments if I want
\r
71 > to do that kind of thing.
\r
73 See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire message, as
\r
74 opposed to just a single part.
\r
76 > This seems to be justifying my fears about the code duplication---the
\r
77 > two code paths are already divergent, (which means that things like
\r
78 > notmuch part-number identifiers cannot be used between the different
\r
79 > formats). I'd like to fix that by preventing the code duplication.
\r
81 > Also, both paths seem to be suffering from some excess part-number
\r
82 > incrementing somewhere.
\r
84 I think the two paths reconverge later in the series. Can you look
\r
85 ahead a bit to see if that concern is addressed?
\r
90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
95 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN0ac+AAoJEO00zqvie6q8LS0QAJtF3KnxKMC1NU+7d5qoypex
\r
96 M/eTd3G4VkyvHO9vEeT1WdJFwqZ/VZsarvUDUoZV7Vqj3+YVyZiQCeDJNGUoxhj6
\r
97 M0otxHOzmR/1S2e/WOOFG2ZqXzi93tzLNtlRze6F3rvIiaEX6zblCkGo74a20DZ/
\r
98 lYecVJazzln7DAZBXHtZHRonNu1pwoQ83qdHVoJLAR00EFsENIwlTETfF7YZyuo8
\r
99 BuQQ7t0fwsPdZSbxB27hjtm+sgCsg7vfYwkm7aPnVWAZlejf+rHBUQK7R4eNK3t9
\r
100 /nKDyi/LfuTVJutMCUInuYcqnAosNx6XPLBRnz8DM6zaFE8AbXVite7lmOf42mFQ
\r
101 iSnORZ+WtZHEJdxA99Cl1xuHaBbZiMAPEQxl6ikxuLPB17OLuihbccLFfjqFe3tX
\r
102 zTpND+BnjGSTSW9wbMw25Q1hFLTtcVZjMG8dWHhzN/nn28vq3BSCzDS/tBsQeVyn
\r
103 IIj3XFuJCntFOXliUwL6WTcUgZhEV0Tl+bYYe4G9IQksHim/O110EIaChUsM9XXK
\r
104 rh96GWZxOgmfAVkiFkDM8vLE2DPLQjZMkeehRW2wOSP9nTxNILLfEAvcQ33Wzhis
\r
105 Qvs7dTexao1kWwNvU7g9/PsYeDovzhrfBzM5kDikplnIHi+nwegXrRJAfRBkzVCV
\r
106 GcsEi9RH5d3zHU3D3HI5
\r
108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r